ALDcon25 Proposal Review Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.Guidance for reviewers: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zLtQLQRpaiyyEAEnxoH4o3bwhwCBSjRP/edit#heading=h.30j0zll Please state the code for the abstract you are reviewing (eg: A03) *What are your initials? *Select your reviewer role: *Reviewer 1Reviewer 2Reviewer 3Which theme(s) does the proposal most closely allign with? You can select one or more options. *Sub-theme 1: LD Across Disciplinary BoundariesSub-theme 2: LDers and Inclusive LDSub-theme 3: The Role(s) of Evidence in Developing LD PracticeSub-theme 4: Artificial Intelligence (AI), Emerging Technologies, and Their Implications for LDNo clear theme idenitifiedHow strongly does the proposal align with the stated theme(s)? Where 1 is low and 10 is high. *Rate 1 out of 10Rate 2 out of 10Rate 3 out of 10Rate 4 out of 10Rate 5 out of 10Rate 6 out of 10Rate 7 out of 10Rate 8 out of 10Rate 9 out of 10Rate 10 out of 10To what extent is the session likely to elicit a good level of interest? I.e., can you see its appeal to the wider ALDinHE community? Where 1 is low and 10 is high. *Rate 1 out of 10Rate 2 out of 10Rate 3 out of 10Rate 4 out of 10Rate 5 out of 10Rate 6 out of 10Rate 7 out of 10Rate 8 out of 10Rate 9 out of 10Rate 10 out of 10To what extent does the abstract include up-to-date content that shares research and/or practical experience in the field of learning development? Where 1 is low and 10 is high. *Rate 1 out of 10Rate 2 out of 10Rate 3 out of 10Rate 4 out of 10Rate 5 out of 10Rate 6 out of 10Rate 7 out of 10Rate 8 out of 10Rate 9 out of 10Rate 10 out of 10To what extent does the abstract support the development of one or more of: new materials, resources, theoretical understanding of, and approaches to learning development? Where 1 is low and 5 is high. *Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5To what extent does the abstract make the value of the session clear? Where 1 is low and 5 is high. *Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5To what extent is the format of the abstract complete and accurate? Where 1 is low and 5 is high. *Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5If there are citations in the abstract, is an accurate reference list included? (see referencing guidance) If there are citations in the abstract, is an accurate reference list included? *Citations in abstract and accurate reference list includedCitations in abstract, but no, or innacurate, reference list includedNo citations in the abstract consider the required To what extent does the proposed session seem to fit the time allotted and the guidance for the format proposed? (please see session format guidance) Where 1 is low and 5 is high. To what extent does the proposed session seem to fit the time allotted and the guidance for the format proposed? *Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5What is your decision? *Accept (A)Accept with minor modifications (AM)Decline (D)Where your decision is AM or D, please formulate feedback in wording that will be clear and helpful to the proposer in understanding the required minor modifications or the reasons for the decline. *Please give any other comments that you would like the conference committee to consider when making the final decision.Submit
