ALDinHE Grant Application Review Form Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.Reviewer Form Please complete the details below after you have reviewed the grant application: Reviewer Bid Number (in file name) *Reviewer Name (Your name) * Before you start the review: Make sure you allocate sufficient time to review the application. Familiarise yourself with the funding application documents, especially the 2025 call and the scoring matrix, which should be consulted closely as you assess the application. Contact ALDinHE if something is unclear (admin@aldinhe.ac.uk) Please refer to the five ALDinHE values, listed below. The application form includes an explicit section about the values; however, stronger applications will demonstrate links (explicit or implicit) to the values across the proposal: Working in partnership with students and staff to make sense and get the most out of HE. Embracing and respecting diverse learners through critical pedagogy and practice. Adapting, sharing and advocating effective learning development practice to promote student learning. Commitment to a scholarly approach and research related to Learning Development. Critical self-reflection, on-going learning and a commitment to professional development. 2. Please complete the assessment grid below after reviewing the grant application. (Please note – you are assessing the application as it stands. We do not request or give opportunities for amendments). The project is clearly aligned to the ALDinHE values. *Excellent (Score 5)Good (Score 4)Average (Score 3)Fair (Score 2)Poor (Score 1)The project will directly impact or further enhance students’ learning experiences of higher education. *Excellent (Score 5)Good (Score 4)Average (Score 3)Fair (Score 2)Poor (Score 1)The project provides evidence of collaboration within the field of Learning Development beyond an individual’s immediate practice (e.g., with students, across institutions or across disciplines) *Excellent (Score 5)Good (Score 4)Average (Score 3)Fair (Score 2)Poor (Score 1) enhances ALDinHE The project has aims which are appropriate and achievable within the context of the project. *Excellent (Score 5)Good (Score 4)Average (Score 3)Fair (Score 2)Poor (Score 1)The project demonstrates how it builds on and enhances the practice and/or literature of Learning Development. *Excellent (Score 5)Good (Score 4)Average (Score 3)Fair (Score 2)Poor (Score 1)The project has a clear evaluation and dissemination plan to evaluate and share the project with the Learning Development community. *Excellent (Score 5)Good (Score 4)Average (Score 3)Fair (Score 2)Poor (Score 1)The project clearly considers and outlines the ethical considerations associated with the project and actions to address them. *Excellent (Score 5)Good (Score 4)Average (Score 3)Fair (Score 2)Poor (Score 1)The project clearly demonstrates value for money and includes sufficiently detailed breakdown of allowable financial costs. *Excellent (Score 5)Good (Score 4)Average (Score 3)Fair (Score 2)Poor (Score 1)3. Please provide a review summary including area(s) of strength and any suggestions for further improvement (if appropriate). Please note these comments will be directly shared with the applicants. 4. Please include any confidential comments for the ALDinHE Research and Scholarship Development group (for example, any reservations you’d have about us funding the application, such as if the overall score is relatively high but the application appears lacking on certain criteria)Overall Score (Total sum of all individual scores given) *Decision (Tick the appropriate box) *AcceptRejectAre you interested in mentoring this project if successful? YesNoSubmit Review